On Wed, 24 Jul 1996, Alex wrote: > On Wed, 24 Jul 1996, Angus A. Mezick wrote: > > Can we please remove the Reply To: field that the list installs to every > > post... > > Just a small aside... but if you have any questions about the list itself, > send them to either me or <circle-owner@cspo.queensu.ca>. The whole list > doesn't have to hear about them (= Well, i guess in this case it's not so bad to post such questions to the list itself, otherwise, how can you check what the list members prefer. (= I wouldn't remove such a useful thing, as the Reply To: part is, just because one complaint. Most lists use it, and there's a reason why. Any not fully dump mail program should give you the option of replying to author or Reply To address as you like anyway, and for the few who have a dump mailing program, it shouldn't be that much of a problem to manually edit the header in the rare cases in which they want to reply to author instead of the whole list. So my vote goes for putting the Reply To: field back in again. Herbert __ Herbert Kremser | "On the Internet, kremser@flinux.tu-graz.ac.at | nobody knows kremser@sbox.tu-graz.ac.at | you're a dog." +-----------------------------------------------------------+ | Ensure that you have read the CircleMUD Mailing List FAQ: | | http://cspo.queensu.ca/~fletcher/Circle/list_faq.html | +-----------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/07/00 PST