Re: read_mobile()?

From: Daniel Koepke (dkoepke@CALIFORNIA.COM)
Date: 08/24/97

On Sun, 24 Aug 1997, George wrote:

-+>also works.  I was wondering which you think is better, and if they're the
-+>same, why you'd choose the first...
-+Probably because read_mobile was changed to accept virtual numbers and the
-+rest of the instances were not changed.  Only thing I can think of at the

or...if you want to check if the mobile exists before calling read_mobile()
[I realize a !read_mobile() will work, too]; or if you want to use the
mobile's real number of something (eg., access to the mob_index); or I'm
sure there's other (better?) reasons that I'm simply overlooking.

Daniel Koepke -:- -:-  [Shadowlord/Nether]

     | Ensure that you have read the CircleMUD Mailing List FAQ:  |
     | |

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/08/00 PST