On Wed, 24 Sep 1997, Jeremy Elson wrote:
-+I've been thinking about this issue since I saw the original mail, and
-+my inclination (believe it or not) is to say that a completely
-+independent module that includes no CircleMUD code may be exempt from
-+following the license. I have a feeling that bringing a piece of code
-+under the license just because it uses Circle's structures may be too
-+strict of an interpretation. (And as for the macros -- well, I
-+suppose someone could just write their own macros to do the same
-+thing as Circle's macros, but what would be the point?)
I suppose it is a little strict of a requirement, although an
"independant module" would be able to run outside of Circle, as
well as inside of Circle; which is a bit problematic to code. :)
-+What do you think, sirs?
Hm, MST3k...
--
Daniel Koepke -:- dkoepke@california.com -:- [Shadowlord/Nether]
Think.
+------------------------------------------------------------+
| Ensure that you have read the CircleMUD Mailing List FAQ: |
| http://democracy.queensu.ca/~fletcher/Circle/list-faq.html |
+------------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/08/00 PST