Robert Peters wrote:
>
> If I'm not mistaken, then the C++ builder is slightly similar
> to Borland's Delphi. In theory, that should have everything you
> need to compile Circle. But I'd hate to have to do that type of
> thing without a command line compiler. You'd have to port Circle
> to use Windows messaging, which I seem to remember someone
> talking about this with Visual Basic a while back, but I don't think
> they had much success. I'd go with Linux and GCC :)
>
> RP.
Yes, you're right. Borland C++ Builder is a native 32 bits windows
compiler, and is not slightly similar, is VERY similar to Delphi. I
remember another guy in the list that compile (sp? compiled? has
compiled? argh...) the mud with BCPPB, but the process is not very easy.
And yes, it supports long filenames... :) (I have written an area editor
in a few days with it, and is very easy to use)
(I'm not speak english, but never get confused about Turbo C++, Borland
C++ and Borland C++ Builder... there are three different products... :)
)
Thanks for reading my english,
--
Leonardo Herrera L.
mailto:leherrer@entelchile.net
"Me voy a subai, me voy a costai, me voy a tapai y
me voy a hacei tuto."
-- Ruy
+------------------------------------------------------------+
| Ensure that you have read the CircleMUD Mailing List FAQ: |
| http://democracy.queensu.ca/~fletcher/Circle/list-faq.html |
+------------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/08/00 PST