Re: Get/Put spam killing?

From: John Evans (evansj@HI-LINE.NET)
Date: 12/11/97


On Thu, 11 Dec 1997, Leonardo Herrera L. wrote:

> George wrote:
> > On Thu, 11 Dec 1997, Doppleganger Software wrote:
> > If you want a generic parsing implementation that works for anything, try
> > looking at my (2*) Parsing patch on my web page.
> >
> > http://www.van.ml.org/CircleMUD or
> > http://capybara.sk-pttsc.lj.edus.si/CircleMUD
>
> I have downloaded this patch, but before to install it, I need to ask if
> this is not very expensive in terms of speed (We have our mud running on
> a linux box with a 486 and 12 (!) mb of RAM! ouch!)...
>

When I played around with the patch a while back it seemed to speed
things up. Less output to to send seemed to mean less drag on the system.
Maybe it was just me expecting improvements because I added something new
and so I saw it "run faster". *shrug*

I would think that that patch would help because it would mean smaller
buffers and that's less RAM usage. That last sentence was purely in
theory. If you want _real_ info about buffers and mem usage go to one of
the pros. I just type like crazy and eventually I get the code to work.
Kind of like the thousand(?) monkeys typing a Shakespearean play. :)

> Just another (off topic, "idiomatic") question... the word is "wierd" o
> "weird"???

weird, definately weird....

John Evans <evansj@hi-line.net>

May the source be with you.


     +------------------------------------------------------------+
     | Ensure that you have read the CircleMUD Mailing List FAQ:  |
     | http://democracy.queensu.ca/~fletcher/Circle/list-faq.html |
     +------------------------------------------------------------+



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/08/00 PST