On Fri, 19 Dec 1997, Daniel Koepke wrote:
>Uhm, I said ANSI C, not 'gcc'. For your information, while gcc, for
That's the -pedantic and/or -ansi flag.
>the most part, follows the ANSI standard, it does not do so to the
>letter. For instance, the ANSI C standard does not define a way for
>zero-length arrays. 'gcc' does. And, last I checked, a terminating
/usr/include/socketbits.h:141: warning: ANSI C forbids zero-size array
`__cmsg_data'
(GNU Libc 6/2.0.5.c header without -ansi flag but with -pedantic)
>'break' was required. In fact, older versions of 'gcc' warned about
>unterminated 'case' statements.
>BTW, is there such a thing as being "simply wrong"?
Of course, we all do it eventually. :)
--
George Greer - Me@Null.net | Genius may have its limitations, but stupidity
http://www.van.ml.org/~greerga | is not thus handicapped. -- Elbert Hubbard
+------------------------------------------------------------+
| Ensure that you have read the CircleMUD Mailing List FAQ: |
| http://democracy.queensu.ca/~fletcher/Circle/list-faq.html |
+------------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/08/00 PST