Re: [Realy Stupid Question] Level Titles

From: Cj Stremick (
Date: 02/10/99

On my MUD, we are implementing Vampires as a playability extension.  Sort of
like Re-mort.  More like Post-mort, actually.  They have tons of
possibilities.  Should be fun to play, I think.

I'm not sure about implementing them as races, really.  A Vampire is just an
alternate state of any race.  There could be elven vampires, ogre vampires,
etc.  Calls also doesn't seem to fit the mold.  It's not so much an
occupation.  That's a tough call and I bet it's possible to come up with
good implementations based around either argument.

You going as far as making them hide during the day?  That'd be a pain in
the butt to players, but I guess if you make good enough benefits, that will
be okay.  I haven't decided how this will be handled yet.  We're thinking of
Lycanthopy (werewolves and other were-beasts) as another option.  That seems
like it could be a fun option along those same lines.


-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Argent <>
To: <>
Date: Wednesday, February 10, 1999 6:07 PM
Subject: Re:  [Realy Stupid Question] Level Titles

>> Yes, i usualy do that. But I'm implementing a lot of new classes (you ppl
>> will just love the coding I'm making for CLASS_VAMPIRE, including
>> and skills).
>> Do you think ppl will get me if I just log in there muds and still titles
>> :-)
>> []s
>Class vampire? My unfinshed implementation is Race. Surely unless you are
>using classes as races, or have not got races , (just to cover myself)
>then a Race is a better idea.

     | Ensure that you have read the CircleMUD Mailing List FAQ:  |
     |  |

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/15/00 PST