> by the way, has anyone had any problems with upping this num... or is this > an arbitrary limit? As far as we could tell, it was an arbitrary number. I submitted it as a bug (or an idea to remove), but apparantly some people use the hardcoded limit as a placeholder. We removed it, though it might be better to come up with a new vnum system if you're planning on going into numbers of that range (e.g., scopes + vnums), because numbers that high become very unwieldy in all circumstances. What we might be doing is having vnums in the form: domain:zone:vnum. That is: load object continent1:city1:100 Etc, with some flexibility. --- Jon A. Nielsen Lazarus of Spear of Insanity MUD http://spear.kilnar.com/ telnet://spear.kilnar.com:1066/ -- +---------------------------------------------------------------+ | FAQ: http://qsilver.queensu.ca/~fletchra/Circle/list-faq.html | | Archives: http://post.queensu.ca/listserv/wwwarch/circle.html | +---------------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/04/01 PST