On Sat, 16 Jun 2001, Cris Jacobin wrote: > Actually I receive no warnings using (1ULL << 36) and lld. However, > now that you point it out it becomes quite obvious. Thanks for the > help. That's really very bizarre. First, AFAIK, (1ULL << 36) should be just as valid as what I recommended. The longer form that I used is, I thought, out of personal preference (something I probably should've noted in the previous message, sorry) and entirely unnecessary. Second, your compiler should at least warn about doing sprintf(buf, "... %lld ...", ..., (1ULL << 36), ...); since you're providing an unsigned value for a signed conversion. What compiler are you using? Are all the warnings turned on? -- Daniel A. Koepke (dak), dkoepke@circlemud.org Caveat emptor: I say what I mean and mean what I say. Listen well. Caveat venditor: Say what you mean, mean what you say. Say it well. -- +---------------------------------------------------------------+ | FAQ: http://qsilver.queensu.ca/~fletchra/Circle/list-faq.html | | Archives: http://post.queensu.ca/listserv/wwwarch/circle.html | +---------------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/05/01 PST