Re: Curious question for act.comm.c

From: Del (caminturn@earthlink.net)
Date: 09/01/01


Carlos Myers wrote:
>
> > Mike Breuer wrote:
> > >
> > >  ACMD(do_write)
> > >  {
> > >    struct obj_data *paper, *pen = NULL;
> > > -  char *papername, *penname;
> > > +  char papername[MAX_STRING_LENGTH], penname[MAX_STRING_LENGTH];
> > >
> > > -  papername = buf1;
> > > -  penname = buf2;
> > >
>
> But two_arguments does not create a new string.  It uses the existing
> strings that were passed to it.  So if you pass it a NULL, two_arguments
> will reformat your harddrive, corrupt you BIOS and finally blow your house
> up.  Well maybe not, but you will get some sort of error.

Ok.. It must be the beginning of a long weekend!
I think Mike was right. But I think MAX_STRING_LENGTH is a little large
for this purpose. Would not MAX_INPUT_LENGTH be better?

--
   +---------------------------------------------------------------+
   | FAQ: http://qsilver.queensu.ca/~fletchra/Circle/list-faq.html |
   | Archives: http://post.queensu.ca/listserv/wwwarch/circle.html |
   +---------------------------------------------------------------+



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/06/01 PST