Re: Problem with find_name

From: The Fungi (
Date: 07/03/02

On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 07:21:56AM -0700, Gerald Florence wrote:
> Oh.  You are correct.  I just realized that its 21 patched with oasis.
> Hmm.  That meant errors were introduced back in and that it
> compiled without any warning in linux.  I think that when I get back
> from my honeymoon, I'll look into this and fix the oasis patch for 20
> and 21 to remove find_name reference.
> I will also put in the comments about find_name being depreciated
> and reference the new function because I know it'll come up with
> other patches.

Neither my OasisOLC nor DGScripts patches against current CircleMUD
CVS snapshots contain any mention of find_name() either. OasisOLC I
adapted directly from Paddy's updated patch for bpl21 and don't
recall having to remove any find_name() function calls or externs.

If you want something to compare against, you can grab my updated
patches from:
{ IRL(Jeremy_Stanley); PGP(9E8DFF2E4F5995F8FEADDC5829ABF7441FB84657);
SMTP(; IRC(; ICQ(114362511);
AIM(dreadazathoth); YAHOO(crawlingchaoslabs); FINGER(;
MUD(; WWW(; }

   | FAQ: |
   | Archives: |
   | Newbie List:   |

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 06/25/03 PDT