You wrote: > > I am just curious, how effecient does circle run under 95? Does > anyone have a mud up running win95 with a significant player > load? I wuld like to check it out. > > I just think windows is the last thing I would run a mud on. Hell > it eats up my 64megs ram just running simple C programs and other > stuff. It eats up 64 MB ??? Wow ! This is more than I expected even from Microsoft. Doesn't Win95 have a virtual memory system ? I have only got 32MB, running NeXTStep for Intel (BSD-Mach UNIX). My compiled circle-mud binary (including debugging symbols - C++ & so) is 7.5 MB. Running it via gdb causes no problems at all (besides 25 other processes and applications). My swapfile is 21 MB big. BTW: My windows look like Windoze95 - guess where Microsoft stole its design for Windows95. From the award winning GUI design of NEXT Inc. Especially the vertical menus, the recycler and the close & miniaturize buttons are exact copies ... > > If anyone cuold give me an address, I would appreciate it. I guess there is none ... > Thanks, > Chuck Cat.+-----------------------------------------------------------+ | Ensure that you have read the CircleMUD Mailing List FAQ: | | http://cspo.queensu.ca/~fletcher/Circle/list_faq.html | +-----------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/07/00 PST