On Wed, 30 Jul 1997, Sammy wrote:
>That's another problem. Too many people don't make backups. I've had to
>rebuild a few Makefiles for people who don't know the meaning of the word.
>My point is that if you've got a Makefile.in and are using unix, there's
>no excuse for not being able to generate a new Makefile using configure.
Actually, I delete configure after I run it, but that's me.
It's an understandable request so I'll start searching for any of mine that
don't do that.
Mine that do change Makefile.in: auction10.patch auction12.patch
auction15.patch samedi.apf.patch
Mine that don't even change Makefile: auction10-12.patch auction20.patch
cpp.patch curse.patch samedi.apf-fix.patch stock1.patch stock10.patch
stock11.patch stock12.patch stock13.patch stock15.patch stock16.patch
stock2.patch stock4.patch stock5.patch stock7.patch stock9.patch
Mine that need to change Makefile.in: auction12-15.patch buffer-v0.9.patch
cpplink.patch makefile1.patch stock17.patch stock18.patch stock3.patch
stock6.patch stock6cpp.patch stock8.patch
Something to do I suppose. :)
--
greerga@muohio.edu me@null.net | Genius may have its limitations, but stupidity
http://www.muohio.edu/~greerga | is not thus handicapped. -- Elbert Hubbard
+------------------------------------------------------------+
| Ensure that you have read the CircleMUD Mailing List FAQ: |
| http://democracy.queensu.ca/~fletcher/Circle/list-faq.html |
+------------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/08/00 PST