On Sun, 31 Aug 1997, David Eliott wrote:
>Everyone keeps talking about how I dont need the struct word in C++, but
>then they say I do need it in some places?? What is the deal with this?
>
>Do I leave them, or do I remove them?
struct foo {
int thing;
}
foo foovar;
It works, but a) you might not remember what foo is without 'struct' and b)
it's not compatible with C. Although it does serve for a little bit
better abstraction although if you really want it, you could typedef it in
C anyway.
I'd vote leave it unless you like abtract.
--
George Greer - Me@Null.net | Genius may have its limitations, but stupidity
http://www.van.ml.org/~greerga | is not thus handicapped. -- Elbert Hubbard
+------------------------------------------------------------+
| Ensure that you have read the CircleMUD Mailing List FAQ: |
| http://democracy.queensu.ca/~fletcher/Circle/list-faq.html |
+------------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/08/00 PST