On Sun, 16 Nov 1997, Will Andrews wrote:
->> if (newlevel > GET_LEVEL(ch)) {
->> send_to_char("Yeah, right.\r\n", ch);
->> return;
->> }
->Umm.. I think it should be:
->
-> }
-> if (newlevel < GET_LEVEL(ch)) {
-> ...
-> }
->
->It's logic: if newlevel is greater than GET_LEVEL(ch), then
->what this part of the function does would be illogical.
Uhm, I think the idea is to not let a Greater God advance someone to
Implementor. If it's lesser than, *then* it's illogical.
daniel koepke / dkoepk@california.com
+------------------------------------------------------------+
| Ensure that you have read the CircleMUD Mailing List FAQ: |
| http://democracy.queensu.ca/~fletcher/Circle/list-faq.html |
+------------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/08/00 PST