Re: bandwith

From: Daniel W. Burke (dwb@IX.NETCOM.COM)
Date: 12/17/97

Next message: George: "Re: [CODE] Two lines trying to define a character"
Previous message: Jonathan Paul Branam: "Re: [CODE] Two lines trying to define a character"
Maybe in reply to: dmitri: "bandwith"
Next in thread: John Evans: "Re: bandwith"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, 17 Dec 1997, dmitri wrote:

> >Completely OS dependant.
>
> that so , hot-shot mr.circle mud boi? first of all COMPLETELY is not a word
> i would use. say for example some coder freak decides, "Hey! lets give all
> those poor 386 and 486 pc owners a chance to run their own circlemud by

I believe he is not referring to the performance of bandwidth, but rather
the max number of open sockets.  I could be wrong, but thats what I gather
anyways.


     +------------------------------------------------------------+
     | Ensure that you have read the CircleMUD Mailing List FAQ:  |
     | http://democracy.queensu.ca/~fletcher/Circle/list-faq.html |
     +------------------------------------------------------------+

Next message: George: "Re: [CODE] Two lines trying to define a character"
Previous message: Jonathan Paul Branam: "Re: [CODE] Two lines trying to define a character"
Maybe in reply to: dmitri: "bandwith"
Next in thread: John Evans: "Re: bandwith"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/08/00 PST