>I don't know if this assumption is correct, but it usually works for
>everything else. Some compilers (I'm assuming) require a 'dt != NULL'
>in there, instead of just 'dt'.
>GCC doesn't have this problem as far as I know, but other compilers ya
>never know. like some require a break; statement EVEN
>after a return; statement in a switch() {}
Now why would I flame someone trying to help me? :)
Anyhow, nah, my compiler will accept if(blah) as if(blah != null). Sorry :{o
Chuck Reed
+------------------------------------------------------------+
| Ensure that you have read the CircleMUD Mailing List FAQ: |
| http://democracy.queensu.ca/~fletcher/Circle/list-faq.html |
+------------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/15/00 PST