On Wed, 21 Jan 1998, Whitey wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Jan 1998, Justin wrote:
> > On Sun, 18 Jan 1998, Chuck Reed wrote:
> > > I think this Guild of Imps is a good idea minus the "badmouthing" of muds
> > > part. There would be nothing wrong with giving out a list of "originaly
> > > coded" muds, but saying someone's mud is "unoriginal" and posting it all
> > > over the net is just a bit rude IMHO. It is the only counter productive
> > > thing I can see about it however, it sounds like a good idea to work on.
> >
> > If you don't like being called fat, lose the damn weight.
> > Being called unoriginal if you are so--and people also need to know what
> > we would qualify as "original"--is not rude, it's the truth.
> >
> > Salvatore
>
> So If I happen to think your mud sucks, you wouldn't mind me putting up a
> web page which states my opinion? Of course, my qualifications for
> 'suckiness' would be listed as well. I can even put together a guild of
> people who think your mud sucks if you like.
>
> If ya can't say somethign nice, don't say anything.
>
> Whitey
Yes, that's absolutely correct. I would not mind one bit if you did that.
As long as, just as you stated, your reasons were stated, along with how
long you played.
Salvatore
+------------------------------------------------------------+
| Ensure that you have read the CircleMUD Mailing List FAQ: |
| http://democracy.queensu.ca/~fletcher/Circle/list-faq.html |
+------------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/15/00 PST