Re: [NEWBIE] 128 bitvectors

From: Edward Glamkowski (EGlamkowski@MATHEMATICA-MPR.COM)
Date: 01/28/98

Next message: Leonardo Herrera: "Re: make_fun_body_parts"
Previous message: Edward Glamkowski: "Re: make_fun_body_parts"
Maybe in reply to: Patrick Sullivan: "[NEWBIE] 128 bitvectors"
Next in thread: Chris Powell: "Re: [NEWBIE] 128 bitvectors"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

I don't think so.  If they are, it must be a fairly recent development.

>----------
>From:  George[SMTP:greerga@CIRCLEMUD.ORG]
>Sent:  Wednesday, January 28, 1998 12:22 PM
>To:    CIRCLE@POST.QUEENSU.CA
>Subject:       Re:  [NEWBIE] 128 bitvectors
>
>On Wed, 28 Jan 1998, Edward Glamkowski wrote:
>
>>Bitfields rule!
>>Even if they aren't very portable... ;P
>
>Thought someone on here earlier said they were ANSI...
>
>Not that I've ever checked for myself.
>
>--
>George Greer  -  Me@Null.net   | Genius may have its limitations, but
>stupidity
>http://www.van.ml.org/~greerga | is not thus handicapped. -- Elbert Hubbard
>
>
>     +------------------------------------------------------------+
>     | Ensure that you have read the CircleMUD Mailing List FAQ:  |
>     | http://democracy.queensu.ca/~fletcher/Circle/list-faq.html |
>     +------------------------------------------------------------+
>


     +------------------------------------------------------------+
     | Ensure that you have read the CircleMUD Mailing List FAQ:  |
     | http://democracy.queensu.ca/~fletcher/Circle/list-faq.html |
     +------------------------------------------------------------+

Next message: Leonardo Herrera: "Re: make_fun_body_parts"
Previous message: Edward Glamkowski: "Re: make_fun_body_parts"
Maybe in reply to: Patrick Sullivan: "[NEWBIE] 128 bitvectors"
Next in thread: Chris Powell: "Re: [NEWBIE] 128 bitvectors"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/15/00 PST