On Mon, 20 Apr 1998, Patrick J. Dughi wrote:
>> That hasn't been changed because people don't type fast enough for that to
>> cause any significant slowdown. Although if anyone has a clean
>> implementation for it, it may be considered.
>
> Define clean implementation?
>
> Any sort of additional functionality? Socials will be sorted with
>low lookup-priority. Other than that?
Keep it stock-oriented, don't get too fancy, and make it understandable.
There's quite a bit of good additions out there right now that we cannot
put in because they are extensive changes. If you do too much, it'll be
after 3.0, if it's a trivial change, it may go into 3.0.
Although I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for new features to get into
3.0, most will be after it's done. :)
--
George Greer - Me@Null.net | Genius may have its limitations, but stupidity
http://www.van.ml.org/~greerga | is not thus handicapped. -- Elbert Hubbard
+------------------------------------------------------------+
| Ensure that you have read the CircleMUD Mailing List FAQ: |
| http://democracy.queensu.ca/~fletcher/Circle/list-faq.html |
+------------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/15/00 PST