On Sat, 13 Jun 1998, Lord Kyu wrote:
> Actually, an "unaffect" brings them back to their natural strength, as
>does letting it wear off. So I was thinking, well, thats nice, but I would
>just like to avoid the problem altogether. Changing it so strength is not
>accumulative isn't really something I had in mind. I was thinking more like
>adding an if case checking to see if strength was < 18/100 or something
>like that. If it is, just fail the spell.
Sounds like a fitting result.
If you really did cast strength on someone that many times (in a fantasy
life), would you not expect something bad to happen?
--
George Greer, greerga@circlemud.org | Genius may have its limitations, but
http://patches.van.ml.org/ | stupidity is not thus handicapped.
http://www.van.ml.org/CircleMUD/ | -- Elbert Hubbard
+------------------------------------------------------------+
| Ensure that you have read the CircleMUD Mailing List FAQ: |
| http://democracy.queensu.ca/~fletcher/Circle/list-faq.html |
+------------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/15/00 PST