On Wed, 17 Jun 1998, d. hall wrote:
>Try using SGI's IRIX IDE compiler, or DEC^H^H^HCompaq's compiler for
>Digital Unix. Native compilers have alway proven to compile faster,
>tighter executables, but let's face it, gcc is the best bang for the buck,
>and a nice and easy package for cross-compiler support.
They aren't always better. There's plenty of braindead compilers out there
from UNIX vendors.
Although I have added perks for those who are using gcc with CircleMUD...
(which are disabled when not using gcc)
--
George Greer, greerga@circlemud.org | Genius may have its limitations, but
http://patches.van.ml.org/ | stupidity is not thus handicapped.
http://www.van.ml.org/CircleMUD/ | -- Elbert Hubbard
+------------------------------------------------------------+
| Ensure that you have read the CircleMUD Mailing List FAQ: |
| http://democracy.queensu.ca/~fletcher/Circle/list-faq.html |
+------------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/15/00 PST