Nocturnal Occulto wrote:
>
> #define WAIT_STATE(ch, cycle) do { GET_WAIT_STATE(ch) = (cycle); }
> while(0)
>
> Curious whats the point with the do/while thing, why not just a simple
> GET_WAIT_STATE(ch) = (cycle); ?
Maybe it avoids ppl doing:
state = WAIT_STATE(ch, tmp);
or
WAIT_STATE(ch, tmp) = state;
Could be a hang over from some older code?
Chris
+------------------------------------------------------------+
| Ensure that you have read the CircleMUD Mailing List FAQ: |
| http://qsilver.queensu.ca/~fletchra/Circle/list-faq.html |
+------------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/15/00 PST