Erwin wrote: > > Would the problem lie in fight.c? > I did take out dual wield *imp earlier*, but I didnt destroy the original > attack function (dont think). > > Peter Ajamian wrote: > > > Yep, the problem is that you broke it when you made one of your recent > > modifications. The solution lies in figuring out what you did that > > broke it, if you tell us what changes you recently made then that would > > help a lot. That would make sense, grab a copy of the stock source and compare the original attack function in it to the one you have, you'll probably find the problem pretty quickly that way. Regards, Peter -- +---------------------------------------------------------------+ | FAQ: http://qsilver.queensu.ca/~fletchra/Circle/list-faq.html | | Archives: http://post.queensu.ca/listserv/wwwarch/circle.html | +---------------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 04/11/01 PDT