> my general feeling on something like that is to open the file up > scroll to the function of interest and examining it thorourghly while > writing my own using my own variable names, logic of my own and > probably a few enchancments as well. according to the gnu group (and a few others), that's considered to be the same thing as cut and paste. if you want to avoid any licensing or copyright, it has to be a "clean" room rewrite. which means not looking at the code. at all. not even as a reference. ae. -- +---------------------------------------------------------------+ | FAQ: http://qsilver.queensu.ca/~fletchra/Circle/list-faq.html | | Archives: http://post.queensu.ca/listserv/wwwarch/circle.html | +---------------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/06/01 PST