On Fri, 19 Dec 1997, Blue Lang wrote:
>nope, it was 2.0.5c. came straight out of the bowels of Red Hat 5.
>Speaking of which, if anyone is upgrading to RH5 and wants the quick and
>dirty on what to do to make your mud compile (it's simple) mail me
>off-list.
Odd, I installed it from the 2.0.5.tar.gz file with 2.0.5c patch. Not a
single problem. Perhaps RedHat did something to the library. (Yes, my
version of the libc works, my MUD is currently running on it.)
>I'm really curious as to what's going on though.. It acted as though
>-fno-strict-prototypes was being completely ignored, or am I
>misinterpreting what that flag is supposed to do?
That basically means (to me) match anything with the same function name.
--
George Greer - Me@Null.net | Genius may have its limitations, but stupidity
http://www.van.ml.org/~greerga | is not thus handicapped. -- Elbert Hubbard
+------------------------------------------------------------+
| Ensure that you have read the CircleMUD Mailing List FAQ: |
| http://democracy.queensu.ca/~fletcher/Circle/list-faq.html |
+------------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/08/00 PST