On Thu, 6 Aug 1998, Angus Mezick wrote:
>At the very end of this function, is there any reason not to do a ch=NULL;
>right have the free(ch); call? I think this might be a nice way to ensure
>consistancy. But for that DT and fast aggr problem, you need to check to
>see if(ch && ch->in_room)
Won't do anything, the pointer's value is passed, not the actual pointer.
If you really wanted to, you'd have to make it a struct char_data **ch in
that function instead, then free_char(&ch), and fix the function
accordingly.
--
George Greer, greerga@circlemud.org | Genius may have its limitations, but
http://mouse.van.ml.org/ (not done) | stupidity is not thus handicapped.
http://www.van.ml.org/CircleMUD/ | -- Elbert Hubbard
+------------------------------------------------------------+
| Ensure that you have read the CircleMUD Mailing List FAQ: |
| http://democracy.queensu.ca/~fletcher/Circle/list-faq.html |
+------------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/15/00 PST