On Tue, 22 Sep 1998, George wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Sep 1998, Jason Wilkins wrote:
> At the time I did that to cause the least changes in bpl14. It has since
> been changed to do the same as strcpy() and the like.
Great, I'll have to go get the latest version.
> More of an aversion to a huge change. Once we take the little step and
> nothing breaks, we go with the whole thing.
I guess I've been coding just long enough to start getting into
programmers mind's. This is exactly what I thought when I looked at it.
Maybe this is a good sign. Its no fun trying to understand code written
by someone that doesn't think the way you do.
> Sort of like the IS_NPC()
> changes. Some of those are in right now, but the critical one [the actual
> macro itself] has not been changed pending further analysis I don't want to
> make at the moment.
Well, at least you are making the analysis. Last week I made a big change
to some code before thinking it through some more. After going back and
doing some design I found out that I had made a big mistake!
ObCircle:
Who exactly is responsible for the "canonical" code base for Circle?
+------------------------------------------------------------+
| Ensure that you have read the CircleMUD Mailing List FAQ: |
| http://democracy.queensu.ca/~fletcher/Circle/list-faq.html |
+------------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/15/00 PST