On Wed, 6 Jan 1999, Daniel Koepke wrote:
>Luis Pedro Passos Carvalho wrote:
>
>> I don't know that library, but if it's portable and robust, why not
>> use it for Circle 4.0? By the way, I still think we should move on
>> to yacc and lex.
>
>As a side note, the parsers generated by yacc/lex are fairly portable,
>so if we distribute both the yacc/lex files and the equivalent C code
>then I can't see the parser seriously impacting portability or even
>requiring people to download new programs (just, if they want to
>change how the parser works, they should almost certainly get yacc and
>lex because the generated C is hideous).
I'll add yacc/lex to the TODO list. Now what exactly did you plan to do
with it so I can add more detail? (scripting language comes to mind, but
you may be thinking command interpreter or something else.)
--
George Greer
greerga@circlemud.org
http://www.circlemud.org/~greerga/
+------------------------------------------------------------+
| Ensure that you have read the CircleMUD Mailing List FAQ: |
| http://qsilver.queensu.ca/~fletchra/Circle/list-faq.html |
+------------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/15/00 PST