http://dailynews.yahoo.com/headlines/technology/zdnet/story.html?s=v/zd/19990630/tc/19990630412
According to that, the clause exists for the purpose of web mirroring. If
they -still- tried to claim material 'submitted to any Yahoo property',
given the statements made and the nature of the license, I'd say it
wouldn't hold up in court.. and if it did, the Yahoo userbase would
drastically atrophy.
Besides, "everyone else is doing it" :p (see article)
(As you can tell from my email address I've been watching this closely :)
Joe
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
+------------------------------------------------------------+
| Ensure that you have read the CircleMUD Mailing List FAQ: |
| http://qsilver.queensu.ca/~fletchra/Circle/list-faq.html |
+------------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/15/00 PST