Re: MUD Sound Protocol.

From: Alex (
Date: 12/23/99

> >A better sequence would have been \n!\r!(...) which can't be spoofed by
> >input.
> It's still spoofable in notes and such.
>   Hi
>   !(...)
> That's "Hi\r\n!(...)" to the client.
And dak's was '\n!\r!(...)'.  Note the *two* '!' marks in there.  Don't
feel bad, I missed it the first time.

However, the entire design of the protocol is weak, regardless.  Last I
checked, you had to define a hard path to the sound in question, rather
than a 'class' of sound (or whatever), which immediately cuts out some
machines.  Ick.


     | Ensure that you have read the CircleMUD Mailing List FAQ:  |
     |  |

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/15/00 PST