Re: [NEWBIE][CODE] invalid_race/invalid_class

From: George Greer (
Date: 03/10/01

On Sat, 10 Mar 2001, Peter Ajamian wrote:

>> Or make a less black-and-white system for equipping. Allow mages to equip a
>> long sword, but they get a huge penalty and can't cast with it wielded.
>> Clerics attacking with slashing weapons become "fallen" (assuming their
>> 'god' gets uptight about that).  Thieves using two-handed swords don't
>> sneak or hide so well.  ...etc...
>Yeah, but I don't follow how that relates to what I just said, maybe you
>misunderstood what I meant by "force them", "them" refered to the macros
>lining up (ie the ITEM_ANTI_ bitvector should correspond with the CLASS_
>list).  That can easily be enforced by not even using #defines for the
>bitvector but just having a single macro like this...
>#define ITEM_ANTI(class) (1 << (class))

It was more a comment on a 'better system' than what was quoted.  Sure, you
could try to make them line up, but I'd rather give them their own
bitvector then.  Currently, not something I want to change.

George Greer

   | FAQ: |
   | Archives: |

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/04/01 PST