Re: META: Public flames

From: Daniel A. Koepke (
Date: 06/20/01

On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, Peter Ajamian wrote:

> Well, as much as I agree with your points and as much as I feel the OP
> deserved to be flamed (as many posters seem to be deserving), it would
> seem the list rules (from the very list FAQ that you were so adamantly
> insisting that the OP should adhere to) do not agree with you
> according to the following quote from section 1 of the FAQ:

That's not a disagreement.  My message was not simply a flame.

Daniel A. Koepke (dak),
Caveat emptor: I say what I mean and mean what I say.  Listen well.
Caveat venditor: Say what you mean, mean what you say.  Say it well.

   | FAQ: |
   | Archives: |

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/05/01 PST