Re: bitvectors issues?

From: The Fungi (
Date: 07/10/02

On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 12:51:00PM -0700, George Greer wrote:
> I think it's due to CIRCLE_UNSIGNED_INDEX, not your bitvector_t.  OasisOLC
> will need some checks adjusted to account for unsigned variables not
> allowing negatives.

Yes. It is and it does. I was working on this very thing just last
night trying to update my Oasis for CVS patch. Ran into a few
problems with the shop lists in genshp.c (I think--not looking at it
at the moment). Terminating the lists with (unsigned short int)~0
results in a lot of 65535's in the *.shp files which the load
procedures didn't seem to like very well. I will attempt to
compensate, probably tomorrow, when I have a chance to get back to
it. Of course it shouldn't be more than a couple hours work to
update Oasis 2.0.1 for CVS or bpl21 for CIRCLE_UNSIGNED_INDEX. If
anyone else wants to try beating me to it I certainly won't
complain. ;)
{ IRL(Jeremy_Stanley); PGP(9E8DFF2E4F5995F8FEADDC5829ABF7441FB84657);
SMTP(; IRC(; ICQ(114362511);
AIM(dreadazathoth); YAHOO(crawlingchaoslabs); FINGER(;
MUD(; WWW(; }

   | FAQ: |
   | Archives: |
   | Newbie List:   |

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 06/25/03 PDT