Well, there is an extremely easy way around this problem. It is a little
less efficient, but it is so small that it is unnoticeable.
send_to_char("*****Immortals******\r\n", ch);
for (i = descriptor_list; i; i->next) {
if (GET_LEVEL(tch) < LVL_IMMORT)
continue;
blah;
blah;
}
send_to_char("*****Mortals******\r\n", ch);
for (i = descriptor_list; i; i->next) {
if (GET_LEVEL(tch) > LVL_IMMORT)
continue;
blah;
blah;
}
This basically creates two seperate lists, and I have had no problems with it.
However, you have to get rid of all parameters that you can place on the do_who
(ie outlaws, thieves, killers, ect), but who the hell uses them anyway, right?
It increases the runtime a tiny amount, but figure your descriptor list will
prolly
average around 30, so its not like it has to wade through alot by adding another
for loop.
Hope this helps
Franco
Bharran, BloodLust MUD
purple.cow.net 4000
At 04:23 PM 7/24/96 -0500, you wrote:
--Cut Snip Slice and Dice --
>*******************************************************
>I am having a major breakdown over this problem.
>
>Here is a brief exmaple of what the who output looks like:
>
>+-+-+-+-+- blah blah
>[ Leader Wiz ] Tray
>[ Initiate War ] Bagget
>
>[ Adventurer Pal ] Drace
>
>
>[ Adventurer Asn ] Shade
>and so on, one extra space after each new entry
>
>Can anyone track this bug????
>
>Thanks, Chuck
>
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| Ensure that you have read the CircleMUD Mailing List FAQ: |
| http://cspo.queensu.ca/~fletcher/Circle/list_faq.html |
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/07/00 PST