Of course it is affordable, I mean its only something like $100, that is durn affordable... esp. compared to Linux, which costs something like... $0, with spreadsheets, emacs (a wordprocessor), gnu c++, c, fortran 77, lisp, perl, tcl/tk, etc., etc., etc., all costing equally as much... plus its fast, clean, and pretty small... so what was that about affordibility? On Sun, 9 Feb 1997, Allen Miles wrote: > Hrm... Win95 is also an AFFRODABLE solution for an OS. > > On Mon, 3 Feb 1997, John C. A. Bambenek, Esq. wrote: > > > Here is the painful truth, Win95 is operating system that caters to > > dummies, when you give it something complicated, like a MUD, Win95 goes > > "What the fuck? When did you get an IQ?" Hence, why running a MUD on > > Win95 is problematic to say the least > > +-----------------------------------------------------------+ | Ensure that you have read the CircleMUD Mailing List FAQ: | | http://cspo.queensu.ca/~fletcher/Circle/list_faq.html | +-----------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/18/00 PST