On Thu, 28 Aug 1997, Akuma/Chris Baggett/DOOMer wrote:
> >think so. :)
> This is where i _truly_ hate to disagree with ya, Daniel.
>
> I personally prefer VI over PICO/PINE or EMACS.
>
> mostly because it accept every character as a different command.
>
> just makes it faster for me.
>
> Any insight into this? :-)
1) I agree with Daniel - JOE forever!
2) Who would call vi editor? In the old days DOS 3.3 and below used to
have 'an editor' called EDLIN that was a line editor... VI is not even
that... And besides, VI that comes with linux is called ELVIS! ;>
3) Let's kill this thread, because it will become a war... and it's way
off-topic...
David!
+------------------------------------------------------------+
| Ensure that you have read the CircleMUD Mailing List FAQ: |
| http://democracy.queensu.ca/~fletcher/Circle/list-faq.html |
+------------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/08/00 PST