Re: larger than 32 bit ints and OS's

From: Edward Glamkowski (EGlamkowski@MATHEMATICA-MPR.COM)
Date: 09/24/97


Of course, the "easy" solution to the 32 bit barrier is
to use bitfields :)
Then the sizeof int on this OS or that doesn't matter
at all!


Edward Glamkowski, Programmer           Mathematica Policy Research
EGlamkowski@mathematica-mpr.com                 Princeton, NJ
                           http://www.mathematica-mpr.com

                    "Wenn du lange in einem Abgrund blickst,
                    blickt der Abgrund auch in dich hinein."   -Nietzsche

>----------
>From:  Angus Mezick[SMTP:angus@EDGIL.CCMAIL.COMPUSERVE.COM]
>Sent:  Wednesday, September 24, 1997 9:20 AM
>To:    CIRCLE@post.queensu.ca
>Subject:       Re:  larger than 32 bit ints and OS's
>
>Digital has OSF
>Data General makes DGUX, but I don't know if they have a 64bit version (damn
>and
>I interned in the Q/A dept there last summer :( )
>--Angus
>______________________________ Reply Separator
>_________________________________
>
>I'm not 100% on MacOS, or MkLinux, but RedHat and SlackWare are 32bit.  As
>far as I know the only redily available 64 bit OS's are a port of Linux to
>the ALPHA, a flavor of SunOS (or was it slowaris?), and I think Digital
>has a 64bit version of DGUX.
>


     +------------------------------------------------------------+
     | Ensure that you have read the CircleMUD Mailing List FAQ:  |
     | http://democracy.queensu.ca/~fletcher/Circle/list-faq.html |
     +------------------------------------------------------------+



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/08/00 PST