On Thu, 25 Sep 1997, Darklord wrote:
> Yes.. i find it to be HELLA STUPID.. why dont people try to make a mud
> realistic..
For me, Because if I want realism, I just go outside, don't need
100% realism in a MUD, thats overkill.
> or have some kind of futuristic out look that might someday
> become real..
Sci-Fi MUDS are around, I like Medieval/Fantasy settings myself,
so I have no intention of adding anything 'futureistic'
> Even if we were in the ear 3000.. people (ie humans) would
> not have like 60 arms to hold 60 fucken things.. and yet another arm
> to wield the sword..
60 is just a SMALL exageration. If you want to add in in-depth
realism, then go nuts, but to much will compromise playability (see past
post about MUD having people sheathing weapons and crap to pick stuff up.
To me, THATS stupid.
> If i wanted to be stipid.. i would create a char with 60 dicks and have
> him dick-slap you in the face that many times.
What the hell?
> Now thats stupid.
You can say that again.
#include <Ryan.G>
+------------------------------------------------------------+
| Ensure that you have read the CircleMUD Mailing List FAQ: |
| http://democracy.queensu.ca/~fletcher/Circle/list-faq.html |
+------------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/08/00 PST