> Why not call it "The Society of Elitist Coders"?
Simple. Because that is not what it is. Pardon my opinion, but I think
this sounds like some damn
affirmative action law on mud administrators. If I damn well feel like
having a group of admins/coder who I think are "good", then thats my damned
business. It's not an equal world.
> That sounds like a pretty lame purpose. Originality is very subjective.
>And do you really think you are providing a valuable service by 'warning'
>people about other MUDs? I bet you won't be warning anyone about YOUR
>mud. I bet YOUR mud will be one of the top recommendations.
>
No its not. Stock = Unoriginal. A developed MUD = original. I think this
is the idea he is trying to get across.
Chuck Reed
+------------------------------------------------------------+
| Ensure that you have read the CircleMUD Mailing List FAQ: |
| http://democracy.queensu.ca/~fletcher/Circle/list-faq.html |
+------------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/15/00 PST