On Wed, 21 Jan 1998, Justin wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Jan 1998, Chuck Reed wrote:
> > I think this Guild of Imps is a good idea minus the "badmouthing" of muds
> > part. There would be nothing wrong with giving out a list of "originaly
> > coded" muds, but saying someone's mud is "unoriginal" and posting it all
> > over the net is just a bit rude IMHO. It is the only counter productive
> > thing I can see about it however, it sounds like a good idea to work on.
>
> If you don't like being called fat, lose the damn weight.
> Being called unoriginal if you are so--and people also need to know what
> we would qualify as "original"--is not rude, it's the truth.
>
> Salvatore
So If I happen to think your mud sucks, you wouldn't mind me putting up a
web page which states my opinion? Of course, my qualifications for
'suckiness' would be listed as well. I can even put together a guild of
people who think your mud sucks if you like.
If ya can't say somethign nice, don't say anything.
Whitey
+------------------------------------------------------------+
| Ensure that you have read the CircleMUD Mailing List FAQ: |
| http://democracy.queensu.ca/~fletcher/Circle/list-faq.html |
+------------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/15/00 PST