What i ment bu the sentence was that after you have changed all the
functions etc, then you can say it is more your mud then diku/circle. I
know credits always have to be in there as that was included in my
previous message:P
On Wed, 3 Jun 1998, Leonardo Herrera L. wrote:
> Ryan Guthrie--Sim wrote:
> [...]
> >(...) When you can look and compare at all the functions and say
> > they all have a significent change in them, then it isn't diku/circle
> > anymore:P
>
> Nopes. No matters what significant the change was, it still is a
> CircleMUD, and however it still remains as DikuMUD derivative.
>
> In the archive files you can found a discussion about that.
>
> Sorry for my english,
> --
> Leonardo Herrera L.
> mailto:leherrer@entelchile.net
> http://www.geocities.com/TimesSquare/Castle/4515/
> "Me voy a subai, me voy a costai, me voy a tapai y
> me voy a hacei tuto."
> -- Ruy
>
>
> +------------------------------------------------------------+
> | Ensure that you have read the CircleMUD Mailing List FAQ: |
> | http://democracy.queensu.ca/~fletcher/Circle/list-faq.html |
> +------------------------------------------------------------+
>
+------------------------------------------------------------+
| Ensure that you have read the CircleMUD Mailing List FAQ: |
| http://democracy.queensu.ca/~fletcher/Circle/list-faq.html |
+------------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/15/00 PST