Re: [ADMIN][Win95] Circle Mud translated in C++ Part 2

From: mmars (mmarsegl@VT.EDU)
Date: 11/04/98

Next message: Brandon Brown: "Re: problem"
Previous message: STW: "Re: [ADMIN][Win95] Circle Mud translated in C++ Part 2"
Maybe in reply to: Mathieu Nantel: "[ADMIN][Win95] Circle Mud translated in C++ Part 2"
Next in thread: Mathieu Nantel: "Re: [ADMIN][Win95] Circle Mud translated in C++ Part 2"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Why not?

*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********

On 1/1/00, at 12:57 AM, STW wrote:

>What's the reason for the mud to be written in a OOP language?
>Seems that you're asking a lot.


     +------------------------------------------------------------+
     | Ensure that you have read the CircleMUD Mailing List FAQ:  |
     | http://democracy.queensu.ca/~fletcher/Circle/list-faq.html |
     +------------------------------------------------------------+

Next message: Brandon Brown: "Re: problem"
Previous message: STW: "Re: [ADMIN][Win95] Circle Mud translated in C++ Part 2"
Maybe in reply to: Mathieu Nantel: "[ADMIN][Win95] Circle Mud translated in C++ Part 2"
Next in thread: Mathieu Nantel: "Re: [ADMIN][Win95] Circle Mud translated in C++ Part 2"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/15/00 PST