On Thu, 21 Nov 1996, DJ Pure wrote:
> *Everyone* is saying to add the &&. This is wrong.
> Someone mentioned to add the () around each seperate check, but LEAVE the
> ||
Wrong wrong...
> You see, with the && the person who is kicking has to be a WARRIOR *AND* a
> BARD if the && is there. The && means AND, which is like saying "nd there's
> no buts about it"..
> eg. if ( (x == CLASS_1) && (x == CLASS_2) ) {
> blahblahblahb...
> }
If I recall right (I don't have the original post handy) the function was
not x== class_1, but rather x!=class_1, which means 'if x is different
than class_1', so and would work perfectly there.
Why used != instead of ==, no idea, mayube because it was a choice of
writing one class against writing three..:)
'If Buddy is not a warrior and buddy is not a bard then he cannot kick,
else he cans, so do it'
This is what I saw and I think I saw it right..:)
Luck
Eduo
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eduardo Gutierrez de Oliveira eduo@sparc.ciateq.conacyt.mx
Administrador de Internet Internet Administrator
Proveedor de Servicio Internet CIATEQ, A.C. Internet Service Provider
Centro de Investigacion y Asistencia Tecnica del Estado de Queretaro, A.C.
http://sparc.ciateq.conacyt.mx/
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| Ensure that you have read the CircleMUD Mailing List FAQ: |
| http://cspo.queensu.ca/~fletcher/Circle/list_faq.html |
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/18/00 PST