Re: [Circle] Problems with kick

From: Eduardo Gutierrez de Oliveira (
Date: 11/21/96

On Thu, 21 Nov 1996, DJ Pure wrote:

> 	*Everyone* is saying to add the &&. This is wrong.
> Someone mentioned to add the () around each seperate check, but LEAVE the
> ||

Wrong wrong...

> You see, with the && the person who is kicking has to be a WARRIOR *AND* a
> BARD if the && is there. The && means AND, which is like saying "nd there's
> no buts about it"..
> eg. if ( (x == CLASS_1) && (x == CLASS_2) ) {
> 	blahblahblahb...
>      }

If I recall right (I don't have the original post handy) the function was
not x== class_1, but rather x!=class_1, which means 'if x is different
than class_1', so and would work perfectly there.

Why used != instead of ==, no idea, mayube because it was a choice of
writing one class against writing three..:)

'If Buddy is not a warrior and buddy is not a bard then he cannot kick,
else he cans, so do it'

This is what I saw and I think I saw it right..:)


Eduardo Gutierrez de Oliveira        
Administrador de Internet                            Internet Administrator
Proveedor de Servicio Internet    CIATEQ, A.C.    Internet Service Provider
 Centro de Investigacion y Asistencia Tecnica del Estado de Queretaro, A.C.

| Ensure that you have read the CircleMUD Mailing List FAQ: |
|   |

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/18/00 PST