On Wed, 17 Jun 1998, Anthony Rye wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Jun 1998, Chuck Carson wrote:
>
> > ...
> > ...
> > #define PRF_DISP_MAXEMOVE 31
> > #define PRF_DISP_MAXMANA 32
> > #define PRF_DISP_VIS 33
> >
> >
> > Anyone have any ideas??
>
> hehe now look at 31 see any thing strange? ...maybe the E between max and
> move shouldnt be there :P
>
The name of a define doesn't matter so long as you use the same name
throughout the code for the same thing. Using one name in the header and a
different in the code will result in compiler errors, and I know that
Chuck's too experienced to mess that up.
(Never thought you'd hear me say that, eh Chuck?) :)
John Evans <evansj@datawest.net>
http://www.hi-line.net/~evansj/ telnet://spear.gator.net:1066
Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.
--Arthur C. Clarke
+------------------------------------------------------------+
| Ensure that you have read the CircleMUD Mailing List FAQ: |
| http://democracy.queensu.ca/~fletcher/Circle/list-faq.html |
+------------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/15/00 PST