Correct me if i am wrong, but UNIX is the only OS that comes close to true multitasking, as well as WinNT.. correct?? Does the mud run faster/better with out as much lag under a multitasking OS as opposed to DOS or Windows 95/98? I've used Cygnus' GNUWin32 and i didn't like it..or rather..my system didn't like it.
mike
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 11/30/98, at 11:03 AM, Deus Irae wrote:
>>I don't know any patches that make it work for any MS compiler. Why would
>>you even WANT to run a mud under windows?????
>>
>
>
>Why wouldn't you? I'm running my mud using GnuWin32 under Windows 98,
>running it all in that Handy little BASH shell. Windows' ability to find
+------------------------------------------------------------+
| Ensure that you have read the CircleMUD Mailing List FAQ: |
| http://democracy.queensu.ca/~fletcher/Circle/list-faq.html |
+------------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/15/00 PST