On Fri, 7 Nov 1997, John Evans wrote:
>Here's a shot in the dark, but I could be wrong: Using ch->points.hitroll
>will compile faster than GET_HITROLL(ch) because the pre-processor
>doesn't have to take the time to replace GET_HITROLL(ch) with
>ch->points.hitroll.
I think it is that way simply because the (new?) macro wasn't applied to
that section of code. I think I put "GET_HITROLL(k) ?" as a comment in the
bpl13 code I sent a few days ago...
--
George Greer - Me@Null.net | Genius may have its limitations, but stupidity
http://www.van.ml.org/~greerga | is not thus handicapped. -- Elbert Hubbard
+------------------------------------------------------------+
| Ensure that you have read the CircleMUD Mailing List FAQ: |
| http://democracy.queensu.ca/~fletcher/Circle/list-faq.html |
+------------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/08/00 PST