At 04:24 PM 8/7/96 -0500, you wrote: >On Wed, 7 Aug 1996, Hades wrote: >> My thoughs on hps, and why hps are shows as a percentage on EbonMists >> >> You get more hps as you get higher in level because you get tougher, more >> battle-hardened. 4 hp from a dagger to a lv 1 man with 6 hps is damn near >> deadly... like he got knifed in the gut. He just lost 66% of his 'life' > >Right. > >> The lv 30 warrior with 356 hitpoints takes the same damage. That is a little >> over 1% of his hitpoints... the equlivant to a papercut to a lv 1 6hp man. > >Right again. > >> Although that dagger wielding orc knifed the man in the gut, the same thrust >> only barely scratched the seasoned warrior, because the warrior knew how to >> turn with the hit, how to avoid the brunt of the damage. That seasoned >> warrior wont allow for the dagger to slice his gut open, and if he did, that >> would be a critical hit, and tghus do more damage. > >Well, if you really wanted to make this accurate, you'd determine a fixed >number of health points (well, sort of fixed) that would only change >slightly with level increases. For example, start it with 50, and run it >up as high as 75 or so for the highest-level characters. Then add a >bunch of skills, like "dodge," which would automatically come into effect >as soon as a fight started. This way, the weapon itself would become >almost unimportant, and instead the skill of its wielder would be the >most vital part of winning a battle. This way, also, you don't have to >have between 300 and 400 different weapons for fighting different >levelled mobs (since that dagger will only be effective at all until >you're level 3 or 4, then you need something else - then your Magic Sword >of Ares won't kill those level 30 or 35 monsters any more, so you need a >Super Magic Sword of Ares, Mark Two, then an Incredibly Powerful Magic >Sword of Ares, Mark Thirty-Seven, and so on). > >Of course, implementing this would be incredibly difficult, since it'd >require revamping all of the current weapons, deleting all the players, >changing pretty much the entire scheme of Circle, and some other things, >too. And I don't even know if it would be worth it. But remember that >even those huge muscle men we affectionately call the "Chinese >Women's Olympic Diving Team" can be killed by a dagger, and with as much >ease as you could kill a regular person - strength doesn't matter, your >skill at evading dagger thrusts does. > >> See how that view works also? > >Yeah. I don't think I like it as much, but it's a lot more feasible than >"my" method. > Well going with this whole set hp thing. I've redone weapons to where they now have a set damage rating. Like say a dagger would have a dr of 5 where a short sword might have one of 13. Now when calculating damage, this dr is added to the PC stregnth and then this total is modified down by the PC mastery level of that weapon. This system seems to work perfectly fine for me and it seems to be a little more realistics then having a weapon that does random damage. Yeah, sure, depending on where you're hit you might be damaged less but come on now. Some of those numbers are riduculous. Zeke +-----------------------------------------------------------+ | Ensure that you have read the CircleMUD Mailing List FAQ: | | http://cspo.queensu.ca/~fletcher/Circle/list_faq.html | +-----------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/07/00 PST